I haven't voted yet till I think this over, but there are only a few items on the poll that I think are worth it. The need for more mods e.g., that would help regardless of if there are rule changes.
I think it can be very relative what is considered banter what is unwanted chatter, because a conversation can so easily branch off the main theme, does that mean ion every case it is off-topic and subject to warnings/infractions. I think the boundaries to what constitutes off topic conversation, nonsense posts and trolling should be discuss first rather than that should rules be changed (which seems to some to be just change for the sake of change). There are no proof that the present rules that members agreed to when they first signed up are insufficient, when they are not fully exercised. The atmosphere as of present seems to be site seems quite laxed. The only way to know there needs to be rule changed if the present rules are enforced full tilt and the despite even that the forum is still in chaos. Otherwise the present rules are not really the issue.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.
|
"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
|
Threaded Mode