|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Which statements do you agree the most with? (public poll) | |||
1A. The rules should be applied equally to all members (ex. rules apply equally to mods and users) | 15 | 60.00% | |
1B. The rules should NOT be applied equally to all members (ex. mods more lenient with regualrs) | 8 | 32.00% | |
2A. Rules should apply equally to all forums | 7 | 28.00% | |
2B. Rules should NOT apply equally to all forums (ex. "Safe Zones" less strict) | 18 | 72.00% | |
3A. Outside safe zones, mod policy should allow for short, nonsense posts | 10 | 40.00% | |
3B. Outside safe zones, mod policy should discourage short, nonsense posts | 13 | 52.00% | |
3C. Outside safe zones, mod policy should prohibit short, nonsense posts | 2 | 8.00% | |
4A. General mod policy should be to react to every instance where a rule is broken | 10 | 40.00% | |
4B. General mod policy should allow for mods NOT to react to an instance where a rule is broken | 15 | 60.00% | |
5A. Details of rule enforcement is ultimately between a mod and a user | 7 | 28.00% | |
5B. Details of rule enforcement can ulimately be subject to other mods scrutiny | 4 | 16.00% | |
5C. Details of rule enforcement can be subject to public scrutiny | 16 | 64.00% | |
6A. For punishment, there should be a general policy to use temporary infractions | 5 | 20.00% | |
6B. For punishment, there should be a general policy to use warnings, infractions / bans | 16 | 64.00% | |
6C. There should be no general policy for how punishment is carried out | 7 | 28.00% | |
7A. For rule enforcement, moderators should use a joint, anonymous account | 4 | 16.00% | |
7B. For rule enforcement, moderators should use their personal accounts | 21 | 84.00% | |
8A. A new moderation policy should have a trial run first (ex. 1 - 2 months) | 18 | 72.00% | |
8B. A new moderation policy should NOT have a trial run first (implemented immediately) | 5 | 20.00% | |
9A. The mod team should be bolstered with additional mods. | 13 | 52.00% | |
9B. The mod team should NOT be bolstered with additional mods. | 6 | 24.00% | |
9C. The current mod team should be retained. | 17 | 68.00% | |
9D. Some or all of the current moderators should be replaced. | 6 | 24.00% | |
10. Some of my concerns are not listed in the individual items, but I will voice them in a reply. | 5 | 20.00% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-09-2015, 02:34 PM | #61 (permalink) | |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
Quote:
A poorly chosen and loaded example then. |
|
06-09-2015, 02:54 PM | #62 (permalink) | |||||||
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,992
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
|||||||
06-09-2015, 02:57 PM | #63 (permalink) |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,992
|
Oh, may I also ask is tore promoting drug use among the mods as policy?
7A. For rule enforcement, moderators should use a joint
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
06-09-2015, 03:00 PM | #64 (permalink) | |||
All day jazz and biscuits
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,354
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The last poll showed that the majority, by a large difference, don't want anything to change. I keep seeing "this is just for opinion" being thrown around. I don't think that's true. I feel like this is continuing because the majority of us don't want to get on board with this. I see it like this. Tore: You want this donut? Vast Majority: No. T: Don't worry. I'm just asking who wants the donut and who doesn't. It's just for opinion. VM: Okay. We don't want the donut dude. T: Have you seen the donut? It's got a lot of cool things that will make you REALLY like it. Here I'll show you... V: We don't want the donut. We like what we are eating already. T: I know. You're entitled to your opinion. If you really don't want the donut, you don't have to have it. It has sprinkles and powered sugar though. I feel it's the best option for your breakfast. VM: WE DON'T LIKE DONUTS. T: Right, but you see, some people over there like and are eating donuts. So, let's talk about the donut some more. VM: FFFFFFFFFRRRRUMMSAARRRRRGGHGHAHGARRRRRRA |
|||
06-09-2015, 04:07 PM | #65 (permalink) | |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
Quote:
I believe what I wrote last time, or even the last two times, is that I don't think it should be all judgment and context. When a moderater is confronted with a user who has broken some rule in some common way, there should be some policy, guideline or precedent as to what the appropriate punishment should be. This makes the job easier. Dealing with common rule breaking shouldn't feel like solving some big dilemma. The unusual situations are what should call for that and this moderator will experience those too. When there's no policy or guideline telling a mod how to deal with a certain situation, it makes it easier to not deal with it.
__________________
Something Completely Different |
|
06-09-2015, 04:09 PM | #66 (permalink) | |||
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,992
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
(And yes, I'm aware of the irony of posting memes in a thread whose OP seems to dislike their use.)
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
|||
06-09-2015, 04:18 PM | #67 (permalink) |
.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
|
All I know is, no matter what happens, I won't stop swearing, making bad jokes, and friendly name calling in threads that allow for it. That's part of the fun. However, if that becomes frowned upon, well...i'll take the infractions.
tl;dr, I agree with you, Exo. |
06-09-2015, 04:24 PM | #68 (permalink) | |
All day jazz and biscuits
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,354
|
Quote:
As for infractions? Sucks to your infractions. I'm also just getting annoyed this whole thing is receiving so much attention after so many of us stopped wanting to talk about it. The conversation is only being seriously discussed by a few people but is being wheeled out as if it is the Poll/Discussion of the century. You can keep going Tore. The people who are having the discussions can keep going. I'm just saying that it seems like the sail is losing a lot of wind and nobody seems to notice on the side of Tore. Don't believe me? Hell, look at the votes. Look at my votes. I side with Tore on a lot of issues. It's just that this whole thing is just too much. There was never a real issue to begin with and these huge polls are just breathing fire on a match trying to turn it into a torch. It's never been a torch. It never will be. |
|
|