New Policy for Rule Enforcement

Freebase Dali · 06-02-2015, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soulflower

Its no winning with some of you. Its either YOUR way or the high road. Tore has been very open and cooperative this entire time.

I am not what else you people want....really.

This is sad.

It's not about winning. It's about doing what makes the best difference for all, not just you and your own priorities. I think most of us are reasonable and would love change for the better, but we need to make sure it's change that we all, as a community majority, agree with. If that's something that threatens your perspective as a member of it, then it's unfortunate to say that perhaps you are not in a position to be giving advice for what's best for the rest of us.

~~Soulflower~~ · 06-02-2015, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RoxyRollah

Who is bashing him. They disagree with his approach, and or ideas.

I agree with some stuff but I also don't agree with some stuff, but I didn't bash him dont lump me in that.

Did I lump you?

No I did not.

I said some members and I did not mention your name.

So I am not sure why you think I did...

Key · 06-02-2015, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soulflower

Its either YOUR way or the high road.

This is actually how Tore has presented this whole thing. It's either his way or not at all. That's the problem. That's why i'd prefer not at all. There's no room for change in what he wants, which as Freebase has stated, it's a package deal, or nothing at all.

YorkeDaddy · 06-02-2015, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soulflower

Its no winning with some of you. Its either YOUR way or the high road. Tore has been very open and cooperative this entire time.

I am not what else you people want....really.

This is sad.

ahahahahahahahahaha

Good one

RoxyRollah · 06-02-2015, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soulflower

Did I lump you?

No I did not.

I said some members and I did not mention your name.

So I am not sure why you think I did...

#feelingguiltyIcalledhimausedcarsalesmen

.

**Janszoon** · 06-02-2015, 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freebase Dali

It's not about winning. It's about doing what makes the best difference for all, not just you and your own priorities. I think most of us are reasonable and would love change for the better, but we need to make sure it's change that we all, as a community majority, agree with. If that's something that threatens your perspective as a member of it, then it's unfortunate to say that perhaps you are not in a position to be giving advice for what's best for the rest of us.

Exactly.

Freebase Dali · 06-02-2015, 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soulflower

I am confused.

So your saying you agree with some of the suggestions but not ALL?

I don't see why you would cast a vote if you agree with some things.

It makes more sense to express what you agree or disagree with versus casting a all or nothing vote.

Or maybe the fact that I proposed an alternate voting solution that included individual rule changes to be voted upon independently was reason enough to not vote on a package deal. I assumed you read that part.

By not casting a vote at all, I remove myself from the opinion pool. And since my opinion is that I don't agree with everything in the package deal, and have proposed a better approach to voting on ideas, I voted no on the package deal.

Don't worry, if Tore creates another poll with individual items able to be voted on, using the multiple choice poll option, I'm sure we'll get far more usable results from the community. At least then, you can be assured that the community is speaking more accurately their perspective and we'll be screwing over less people upon implementation, which I'm sure you can get on board with.

~~Soulflower~~ · 06-02-2015, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freebase Dali

We're not bashing him. We're bashing the poll, which does not provide the community at large an opportunity to vote on what they want rather than what Tore wants as a package deal.

I prefer the opportunity for people to choose what they want changed, and I'm sure there are those out there that would love to see some of Tore's suggestions implemented, as would I, but other options, not so much. So if we're to actually be fair, why not ask that the poll is fair and considers that aspect?

I notice you are kinda new to this discussion.

The reason why the poll was created was because there was a prior discussion between members and Tore about some possible new rule implementations that he suggested and most of the members did not like it while some agreed with his idea.

Most of the members were insisting that they did not want rules or infractions and enjoyed the current culture of the forum.

And IMO Tore created the poll as a result of the discussions and suggestions that were discussed.

So I don't think its fair to blame the creation of the poll strictly on "what Tore wanted" when he actually talked to multiple members (for feedback) before doing it.

The consensus that was gathered from the discussion was that some members did not want rules and infractions which is why the poll is either YES or NO for rules and infractions.

RoxyRollah · 06-02-2015, 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon

I'm wondering why the new non-loaded thread title was sent to a mod who's offline rather than just posting it in this thread so that the first mod available can do it. Seems rather strategic.

This is scandalous! Stop playin. That' s hard core man and it speaks to me more than anything anyone has written thus far.

**Janszoon** · 06-02-2015, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RoxyRollah

This is scandalous! Stop playin. That' s hard core man and it speaks to me more than anything anyone has written thus far.

Stop the presses!

View Poll Results: Are you in favour of a new policy for rule enforcement? (not anonymous)
Yes	13	36.11%
No	20	55.56%
Don't know	3	8.33%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll