Changes to Rule Enforcement - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > Announcements, Suggestions, & Feedback
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-01-2015, 07:23 AM   #11 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
I was under the impression that the temp ban system was an automatic three strikes thing: first ban = 1 week, second = 1 month, third = perma ban. Like, it's just built into the computerization and ****.
Hmm, is it? Possibly. I forget the details of any policy we might have had in my time.

In general, I am in favour of systems that "forget". I like second chances (or third or fourth, etc). To put it philosophically, I think that given infinite time, even the average well-behaved member would get an infinite amount of infractions - or an infinite amount of temp bans. That doesn't mean their net contribution to the community is negative.

Of course, as mentioned before, special cases may require special measures. One neat thing about consistent use of the infractions system is; if a member was particularly difficult, you could basically give them less freedom than other members by giving some infractions on a very long timer (or even permanent). F.ex if a member had 9 infractions lasting for a year, they would have to behave pretty darn well the next 12 months to avoid tempbans.

I think it's neat.
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.