|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-04-2015, 12:29 AM | #361 (permalink) |
.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
|
^From my perspective, it shouldn't even be a rule. Who cares if a few members go off topic for a few minutes in a thread. That's not something that needs to be infracted, otherwise you're basically just giving people a reason not to want to post with their friends which in turn will bring the amount of posts per day way down, and a lot of the enjoyment at this forum would be gone.
|
06-04-2015, 01:08 AM | #362 (permalink) | |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
Quote:
__________________
Something Completely Different |
|
06-04-2015, 01:29 AM | #363 (permalink) |
.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
|
I don't really think much of it when the rules as they stand seem to be doing a good job at keeping this place as civil as it is. The mods do the dirty work behind the scenes when it comes to drama and posts that really don't serve much purpose to a thread but at the end of the day, people are always going to go off topic in threads that it doesn't belong in. It's human nature. Nothing you can do about it. I don't really see a need to change anything about it. It's like changing something good to hopefully have it be better, but only to find that the better is actually worse.
|
06-04-2015, 01:36 AM | #364 (permalink) | ||
Oracle
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Closer then you think.....
Posts: 4,365
|
I think the only deep seeded issusse that we a forum should make an effort to be nicer to eachother .Not talking about horsing around. But like when **** gets real,and we if we can do that we are on the right track.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
06-04-2015, 03:58 AM | #365 (permalink) | |||
carpe musicam
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº? “I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac. “If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle. "If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon "I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards |
|||
06-04-2015, 05:55 AM | #366 (permalink) | ||
Oracle
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Closer then you think.....
Posts: 4,365
|
@ neo dude this isn't the thread to giff. Makes you look like you can't police yourself. Just sayin.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
06-04-2015, 06:03 AM | #367 (permalink) |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
I'm pretty sure I answered this question long ago in this thread, but my answer is that I don't have the same all or nothing perspective on the rules that you do. Yes, I believe that that short/nonsense rule should exist but no I don't believe it should be enforced on every individual instance of a short/nonsense post. It exists because we need a way of addressing the issue of people who have a pattern of posting nonsense constantly, but people doing it occasionally isn't an issue. It's like a city having a noise ordinance on the books. It would be absurd, even detrimental the culture of the city, to have the cops show up every time someone has a party, but you need the rule on the books for people who do it so often that becomes a nuisance.
|
06-04-2015, 06:27 AM | #368 (permalink) | |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
|
Quote:
I've no issue with "lol" or "wtf" posts, in fact I've no issue with any posts other than spam or openly (openly, not jokingly) offensive posts. "You're a prick" said to someone who knows how it take it is fine. "You're a prick" said to a new member, or someone who can't take a joke or doesn't understand it, is not, and the member posting should be able to make the distinction. F'r instance, there are plenty of people to whom I could post "oh just **** off will you, you know that's not what I mean", and they would not get offended by use of the expletive. But there are some who would get offended, even report me, so to those people I would respond differently. As I said already, one size does not fit all and a one-word or even nonsense post can be very acceptable in any thread, as can gifs or YouTubes, as long as their intent is understood. You know my position with the rest of your rules, so I won't repeat myself.
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
|
06-04-2015, 06:41 AM | #369 (permalink) | |
Aficionado of Fine Filth
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: You don't want to look in there.
Posts: 6,898
|
I was thinking the exact same thing.
Quote:
|
|
06-04-2015, 07:18 AM | #370 (permalink) | |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
Trollheart, I think you may be missing something. Did you see the question I asked Ki?
The short posts rule is not actually part of my proposition. I'm not against it, but it's not "my" rule. Quote:
It's not dangerous to get infractions as long as you don't get too many. In other words, you could post nonsense posts now and then. But if you have a "pattern of posting nonsense constantly", you'd get tempbanned. People insist on taking offense to any infractions at all, but as I've mentioned before, one could instead see it as a measure of freedom. If you've got 8 infractions, you don't have as much freedom and should wait a bit before posting more nonsense. If you have 0 infractions, you can post more nonsense. Just play it smart and try to keep up with the score. If mods wanted to be more lenient than my initial proposition, you could say breaking the short post rule gives you 1 infraction for 1 week. Then you could break the rule 9 times in a week without real repercussions.
__________________
Something Completely Different Last edited by Guybrush; 06-04-2015 at 07:27 AM. |
|
|