Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Announcements, Suggestions, & Feedback (https://www.musicbanter.com/announcements-suggestions-feedback/)
-   -   Missing Posters Bulletin Board (https://www.musicbanter.com/announcements-suggestions-feedback/77950-missing-posters-bulletin-board.html)

Key 10-25-2015 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by monkeytennis (Post 1646443)
What rule did she break?

Also you were more abusive to her than the other way round. Came across as bullying at times.

Yeah. And she was just little miss perfect all the time. Never going into threads to stir **** up for no reason.

Exo 10-25-2015 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by monkeytennis (Post 1646443)
What rule did she break?

Also you were more abusive to her than the other way round. Came across as bullying at times.

Yeah, I deleted that post he just made.

Soulflower was banned because the only reason she came back and started posting, even if it was for one day, was to stir sh*t. I don't care about the past. I don't care if she felt people were ganging up on her. In my opinion, there were some drama fits that had posts directed at her that seemed uncalled for, but this was always after she made some ludicrous statement about other members being either racist or not as intelligent as her. That's why she was banned. I don't think she was doing it on purpose just to troll, but she certainly did it so that she could stir the sh*t pot. It's the only reason she came back.

Also, I didn't ban her, so this wasn't some sort of vendetta. The whole mod team had enough.

Cuthbert 10-25-2015 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ki (Post 1646445)
Yeah. And she was just little miss perfect all the time. Never going into threads to stir **** up for no reason.

Ignore it if you don't like it. She didn't break any rules. Posters shouldn't be banned just because you don't like them.

Which rules did she break? What exactly did she do that deserved a permanent ban?

Exo 10-25-2015 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by monkeytennis (Post 1646449)
Ignore it if you don't like it. She didn't break any rules. Posters shouldn't be banned just because you don't like them.

Which rules did she break? What exactly did she do that deserved a permanent ban?

Quote:

General Rules:
• While debating and discussion is fine, we will not tolerate rudeness, insulting posts, personal attacks, trolling, purposeless inflammatory posts or members deliberately provoking another member into committing any of these acts.
She was the queen of this.

And if you think that I'm being unfair to Soulflower and not treating other members the same...I delete Ki's bullsh*t when I see it too. Ki however knows what he does and makes attempts to keep it down, or at least apologizes for it. Soulflower relentless thought she was doing nothing wrong. She called me out for something I said to her in Plug, which I apologized for, an apology that she accepted. It's only proof she was here to start sh*t.

Cuthbert 10-25-2015 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exo (Post 1646448)
Yeah, I deleted that post he just made.

Soulflower was banned because the only reason she came back and started posting, even if it was for one day, was to stir sh*t. I don't care about the past. I don't care if she felt people were ganging up on her. In my opinion, there were some drama fits that had posts directed at her that seemed uncalled for, but this was always after she made some ludicrous statement about other members being either racist or not as intelligent as her. That's why she was banned. I don't think she was doing it on purpose just to troll, but she certainly did it so that she could stir the sh*t pot. It's the only reason she came back.

People actually did gang up on her though, I remember just posting once if she had been banned or had left and people flew in with twattish posts.

If she thinks people are racist or not as intelligent is that reason enough to ban her? I don't think it is.

Quote:

The whole mod team had enough.
I very much doubt this is true.

The Batlord 10-25-2015 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by monkeytennis (Post 1646449)
Ignore it if you don't like it. She didn't break any rules. Posters shouldn't be banned just because you don't like them.

Which rules did she break? What exactly did she do that deserved a permanent ban?

Long ago, her entire reason for being here changed from talking about music or participating in the community to being disruptive. Whether or not it was intentional, she was a troll and there was no point in not banning her.

Cuthbert 10-25-2015 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exo (Post 1646452)
She was the queen of this.

And if you think that I'm being unfair to Soulflower and not treating other members the same...I delete Ki's bullsh*t when I see it too. Ki however knows what he does and makes attempts to keep it down, or at least apologizes for it. Soulflower relentless thought she was doing nothing wrong. She called me out for something I said to her in Plug, which I apologized for, an apology that she accepted. It's only proof she was here to start sh*t.

She posted stuff people didn't agree with, what a crime. She was also one of the posters who regularly posted about music.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1646455)
Long ago, her entire reason for being here changed from talking about music or participating in the community to being disruptive. Whether or not it was intentional, she was a troll and there was no point in not banning her.

She contributed a lot to music discussions whether people like it or not. Also a lot of posters persistently had a go at her (Ki is one of them and it was just unpleasant to read), even when she hadn't posted.

I think she was passionate but she wasn't a troll.

Exo 10-25-2015 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by monkeytennis (Post 1646462)
She posted stuff people didn't agree with, what a crime. She was also one of the posters who regularly posted about music.

You asked which rule she broke and I showed you. It was a rule that she broke mercilessly. I also don't agree with calling somebody a racist because they don't like Whitney Houston just "something that people don't agree with".

Lisnaholic 10-25-2015 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1646431)
Vegangelica always sides with the "other" person. Regardless of whether or not they had a leg to stand on.

I think it´s great that we have a whistle-blower in MB - someone who is prepared to ask awkward questions. Vegangelica does a lot to keep MB democratic imo. :clap:

Frownland 10-25-2015 07:21 PM

^Actually, we're racist because we don't like Janet Jackson. Get it right, Exo.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:45 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.