Originally Posted by Forward To Death (Post 1405467)

Figured that as soon as I saw this thread. :laughing:

Man, google sucks. Can I say that?

Originally Posted by markablue (Post 1405429)

Thanks for the warm welcome. :laughing:



Unfortunately, we got notified by Google that there are images on our forums that are not in compliance with their guidelines. They are pretty strict so believe me, we are all shaking our heads while doing it but it needs to be done.

Sorry we didn't have time to let you guys know in advance. We're about done now so you will be back in Yac's hands. However, the policy regarding nudity mostly will be stricter from now on.

That's it from me. Again, apologies for catching you off guard.

Oh, and the info about markablue is outdated, it's just the same account so don't start hating ghosts. ;)

Originally Posted by Urban Hat€monger ? (Post 1405521)

That'll be gone by tomorrow

Originally Posted by markablue (Post 1405429)

Unfortunately, we got notified by Google that there are images on our forums that are not in compliance with their guidelines. They are pretty strict so believe me, we are all shaking our heads while doing it but it needs to be done.

Originally Posted by Mojo (Post 1405378)

Objectionable material? Damn it, I told DJ not to post that picture of himself in his owl onesie and slippers.

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1405670)

What exactly are those guidelines anyway?

Originally Posted by Freebase Dali (Post 1405874)

No pictures Google doesn't like.

I'm being serious.

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1405890)

So the guidelines are just arbitrary?

Originally Posted by LoathsomePete (Post 1405894)

Yes. Miley twerking appears to be fine but a woman with an exposed mid drift is a no-no.