|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-10-2013, 11:31 AM | #1 (permalink) |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
"What are you listening to right now" Threads Question
Does anyone else think that these "What are you listening to right now" threads might be stunting discussion?
I ask for two reasons: 1. I rarely go in the thread because its either a pithy one-off sentence or a youtube video. 2. I see them bumped a lot. Do those threads (this is a "your opinion" question) prevent a band thread from being made or an existing thread from being elaborated on? I get the impression that they were created at the height of the "Being on MB with nothing to talk about" craze and they've carried over. I'm not saying I'm right - I'm asking - but it seems to me we'd be better served by getting rid of them.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
08-10-2013, 11:50 AM | #2 (permalink) |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
|
I don't like them, I think all chain threads are a waste of time but others don't.
__________________
Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
08-10-2013, 11:58 AM | #3 (permalink) | ||
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
Quote:
But I also have to say that if you're posting in one of those threads, then you probably don't particularly feel like making/contributing to a more in depth thread about the band.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
08-10-2013, 12:25 PM | #4 (permalink) | ||
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
Quote:
I'm against getting rid of them and that's the bottom line. If people did want to really discuss a band/artist then they would create a thread about it anyways but most people realize that you won't get any new posts in said thread. You may only get a few views and that's about it.
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
||
08-10-2013, 12:32 PM | #5 (permalink) |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
But whats the argument for them? People are too lazy to find the thread devoted to the band?
From my perspective, I only click "New Posts" and go into what strikes me as interesting. If I were to go into a "What are you listening to" thread and they just posted a youtube video and some non-descript comment, I have nothing else to go on. If its in an actual thread about the artist(s), then I've got a little bit of an idea of whats going on already. I just feel like these threads are the lowest common denominator and more over, discussion that happens in those threads actually hurts the thread about the band because a piece of the discussion is now disjointed. I'm not burning with a passion to seem them removed, but I don't see what positives they give us.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
08-10-2013, 01:02 PM | #6 (permalink) | |
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
I just broke down the positives that they give us. Well that they give me, they probably don't give you any positive because you want to see a well worded discussion about the track prior to listening to it but I don't need that. Sure, it can be a bit spammy and a bit of a dumping ground but I do listen to some of those and I end up finding artists/bands that I wouldn't have listened to on my own. Forcing people to create a thread about each band that they post about and having them do a write up is a negative in my opinion. Sure it may foster better discussion but in my experience they are normally avoided and you don't get much response from them.
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
|
08-10-2013, 07:36 PM | #7 (permalink) |
we are stardust
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,894
|
I agree also in that I find them a little pointless, a few times I've gone in there and commented on others' videos and tried to start discussion about things that have been posted but rarely does anyone reply... It's usually just a sentenceless video post.
|
08-10-2013, 11:29 PM | #8 (permalink) | |
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
I don't get the reasoning behind "oh it's pointless so instead of me skipping over it, we should get rid of them"
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
|
08-10-2013, 11:46 PM | #9 (permalink) |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
Because its actively damaging the existing threads for those acts. We benefit from consolidated discussion.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
08-10-2013, 11:47 PM | #10 (permalink) | |
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
Consolidated discussion isn't going to magically happen when those type of threads are gone.
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
|
|