|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-27-2012, 07:24 PM | #171 (permalink) |
Registered Jimmy Rustler
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,360
|
Wait wtf I thought this had to be a joke until I clicked forum leaders and saw his name. Yac is it not possible you could elaborate on this decision???
__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew* *Always Checks Credentials Crew* *nba > nfl crew* *Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew* |
03-27-2012, 07:33 PM | #173 (permalink) |
Registered Jimmy Rustler
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,360
|
I shall do that, FreebaseShreddz.
__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew* *Always Checks Credentials Crew* *nba > nfl crew* *Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew* |
03-27-2012, 07:55 PM | #176 (permalink) |
Al Dente
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,708
|
Here's the deal. everbody who's been a member of this site for at least the past 2-3 years has noticed a significant drop in the quality of the forum. There's been multiple threads created on the subject with everyone giving there own two cents as to what they believe the reason is. More theories have been postulated about this than theories about what killed the dinosaurs. The truth of the matter is that the amount of active members on the site has grown immensely, yet the proportion of people who actively engage in intelligent, respectful discussion regarding music (of all things) has not grown commensurately. The sense of community and unified purpose used to be the hallmark of this place. For my own part, it's the reason why I was once very active on here.
Part of the problem of this is the way that mods are chosen. In one sense it's a great thing that mods are elected by other mods, because we're able to see first hand whether or not a member will be an appropriate fit for the position, but sometimes it doesn't quite work out that way. When a mod comes into their position having already developed relationships with some of the members, there is a hesitancy to to their job with any sort of impartiality. It's difficult to effectively be in a position of power while still desiring to be respected and well-liked by one's peers. The result of trying to balance both is a hesitancy to take action when action is necessary, as well as favoritism, which clouds judgement. In the end, what you have is no longer a unified sense of community, but a collection of cliques, and on the mod side, a bureaucracy that impedes progress. When I was given my first tenure as moderator, it was very controversial because I hadn't been a member for very long at all, but as people got to know me they discovered that I was genuinely interested in the community and really knew my stuff. Perhaps the best thing to do with Jayshredzz is give him the benefit of the doubt. It's understandable that as a new member he's testing out some of his more unpopular opinions and realizing the power to provoke others to strongly disagree with him. That'll mellow out as he becomes more acclimated to engaging in discussion on here, and as he's called to make impartial decisions as a moderator. I honestly think that this may be exactly what MB needs to become a better forum and I look forward to being more active here than I have been in quite some time. |
03-27-2012, 08:10 PM | #178 (permalink) |
Al Dente
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,708
|
I know we're all supposed to be shiny happy people holding hands and ****, but really how much fun is that? Save it for the upcoming Official Kum Ba Yah Thread. I have gone through his entire post history and yes, I think his opinions are asinine, but at this point I'll take asinine opinions and the ensuing drama over 35 pages of who wants to be first in line to fellate Tom York.
|
03-27-2012, 08:14 PM | #179 (permalink) | |
D-D-D-D-D-DROP THE BASS!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,730
|
Quote:
Also his opinions are tempered with an attitude that specifically precludes the introduction of open discussion because he actively discourages the introduction of an alternative opinion. |
|
|