|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Read the First Post! How would you feel if a new "MB" site was started? | |||
Brilliant idea - Would be eager to join the new site | 11 | 30.56% | |
Positive - Like the idea and would sign up, but reluctant to leave MB | 11 | 30.56% | |
No opinion / Don't Care / Undecided | 4 | 11.11% | |
Negative - Reluctant to change activity to new site, but would if the majority does | 6 | 16.67% | |
Horrible idea - People who leave the old site are traitors. I'd never abandon MB! | 4 | 11.11% | |
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-14-2011, 10:02 AM | #21 (permalink) | |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
Quote:
I'm for the idea. I have a modicom of web design skills if you need anything. Let me know.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
|
03-14-2011, 11:09 AM | #22 (permalink) | |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
The advantage of a forum is that everyone has even access, and equal say. A community site would have to have it's content controlled by whoever is moderating it, taking away the communal feel of the forums.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
03-14-2011, 11:34 AM | #23 (permalink) |
∞
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,792
|
Hmmm I'm not sure about this idea. I think setting up a new site might damage the wonderful MB community we currently have. Why risk fracturing our community just for the sake of some extra site features?
I think better idea would be to set up a petition for requesting change/more administration, get as many members as possible to put down their name and send it to the admins. Maybe they'll see the potential that this site has?
__________________
|
03-14-2011, 12:20 PM | #24 (permalink) | ||
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
Quote:
Why do certain people feel like if there is a new site that the community will become divided and members will only go to one site and not the either and vice versa? it's just another site...what's wrong with visiting both of them?
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
||
03-14-2011, 12:33 PM | #26 (permalink) | |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
Quote:
The two sites would be in the same niche or at least have very overlapping niches (general music discussion) and so would be competitors for limited resources which are users and the time those users spend on the internet. I'm sorry, I wish it wasn't true, but .. it is. And it's something to consider.
__________________
Something Completely Different |
|
03-14-2011, 12:43 PM | #27 (permalink) | |
∞
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,792
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
03-14-2011, 12:55 PM | #28 (permalink) | |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
I'm not sure people should vote as if they knew what others are voting though. If you only think it's a bad idea if it splits the community, but otherwise love it, then you should vote that you like the idea. Otherwise, you get a situation where people vote negatively just because others vote negatively .. instead of voting for what they themselves would like to see happen.
Quote:
Personally, if something like this happened, I'd love to see us put our collective skills together to create something to suit all of us.
__________________
Something Completely Different |
|
03-14-2011, 12:59 PM | #29 (permalink) |
Atchin' Akai
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Unamerica
Posts: 8,723
|
Admin need to be petitioned by the members outlining their concerns of the future of this site due to their own inactivity and apparent disinterest.
They should be given the option to make the improvements the members want before the creation of a new site. If they fail to make the improvements necessary, then there can be no half measures, no duel memberships. If they are not interested...why should we be? |
03-14-2011, 01:08 PM | #30 (permalink) | ||||
Facilitator
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where people kill 30 million pigs per year
Posts: 2,014
|
Quote:
I wrote before in another thread that if you could get enough people (1,000) to sign a petition asking the administration to make the site changes desired by MB members, then based on my experience with petitions in a REAL community of around 50,000 people this would probably get the leadership's attention and willingness to work on making improvements. A petition, however, would require ORGANIZATION to be effective. You would probably need to set up a contact tree in which core members send private messages to other members to make them aware of the MB petition. For example, those poeple who vote YES on your poll here, Tore, might be willing to try one last time to get the changes they want on MB by... (1) working together to write a petition, and (2) dividing the MB membership into sections based on their usernames (A-C, E-G, etc.) and sending private messages to the active users to ask them to sign the petition, which would be its own separate thread, similar to this one. If 1,000 people sign the petition requesting changes to MB, and the administration STILL ignores these requests, then I think setting up a new site would be reasonable AND feasible, especially with 1,000 people ready to divert their energies to a new music community they create. BTW, www.muzicbanter.com has not yet been taken as a domain name! I checked. You can buy a domain name for around $20/year at places like GoDaddy.com, and have your URL link to your new music community that you can set up for free at various websites, I assume. With a name like MuzicBanter, you might entice a lot of confused young new members who were trying to find MuzicForums or MusicBanter! Quote:
I know one member of MuzicForums who, after being banned, set up a new website that I joined to show support. However, I just don't have time to post on MuzicForums AND another site AND here. If enough people from MB joined together to create a new site, I'd happily follow, however. That would mean I wouldn't post here as often, though, because I just wouldn't have the time to do both. Quote:
I encourage you not to give up on MB until you (the mods) and other members have tried Zero's petition idea. It would require organization, communication, and effort to succeed. If the petition failed, then leaving MB for a new community would *not* be abandonment or mutiny. The abandonment would have been done by the administration. That's the whole source of the problem to begin with: the administration has abandoned MB by being minimally responsive. EDIT: Basically I'm saying what Right-Track said and posted while I was working on my longer version of his wise words!
__________________
Quote:
|
||||
|