|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-15-2010, 11:22 AM | #721 (permalink) | |||
Facilitator
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where people kill 30 million pigs per year
Posts: 2,014
|
Quote:
...e-mail verification systems! Email Verification 5.0.0 Since the owners aren't advertising, then the site must just be an investment for them and nothing more. So, to gain the owners' attention or get sold to someone who wants to make larger improvements, I still think the site has to grow and become überhot. Here are the current stats on which to improve: Quote:
(It would help if the place went to hell for a while to drive the price down. Maybe if I post more often...even longer, more tedious posts...I'll drive more people away. THEN I'll make my takeover move. Bwaa haa haa haaaaaa!)
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by VEGANGELICA; 11-15-2010 at 11:28 AM. |
|||
11-15-2010, 11:27 AM | #723 (permalink) | |
MB quadrant's JM Vincent
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,762
|
Quote:
__________________
Confusion will be my epitaph... |
|
11-15-2010, 11:44 AM | #724 (permalink) | ||
Facilitator
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where people kill 30 million pigs per year
Posts: 2,014
|
Quote:
Actually, MusicBanter wouldn't be too bad of an investment especially if someone loves music. The main website competitor that I see, MuzicForums, is only worth around $1500. MusicBanter has much more pull because it is older with more members...currently. If someone who loved music actually owned the site and didn't see it *just* as an investment, then you could probably make quite a few improvements for the sake of the whole community and music. The only downside for the new owner would be needing to protect your investment...such as by no longer allowing obvious downloads of bootlegs. I hear that websites can get shut down for that. If I were the owner, I would need to enforce copyright laws on the Boards. I assume what goes on in private in PMs couldn't be checked? You think the idea of a member-owned site isn't good? You must not have spent much of your life investing, Mr. Cunning!
__________________
Quote:
|
||
11-16-2010, 12:44 AM | #725 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 1,322
|
Quote:
And this has probably been brought up before, but how about giving everyone the capability to change their own Avatar to a bigger size. Within the limit of course. And so people won't overdo it, make A limit like once every 3 months. |
|
11-16-2010, 03:07 PM | #726 (permalink) | |
Partying on the inside
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
|
Quote:
If users could upload large avatars, I don't think there would need to be a limit to how often they change it. The only reason we suggest that people stick with their avvy for a reasonable amount of time is because there's only so many mods and there are a lot more regular users, so it would get hectic for us. I have noticed that we get a lot less avvy requests since we moved the avatar thread and started requiring that the user do all the necessary resizing. I don't know if people just don't feel like doing the work or are afraid we'll yell at them for requesting an avatar... We won't. By all means, if you want a new avatar, request one in the avatar thread after reading the guidelines. |
|
11-16-2010, 03:30 PM | #727 (permalink) | |
FUNky
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 2,482
|
Quote:
edit: I tried to change this setting and couldn't find it. Help?
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/ohio0808 sometimes I don't thrill you sometimes I think I'll kill you just don't let me fuck up will you 'cause when I need a friend it's still you |
|
11-20-2010, 12:49 AM | #729 (permalink) |
we are stardust
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,894
|
Pretty sure you can change all those settings via the Last.fm website where you create your little thingy. You can select what tracks it shows (i.e. whether it shows recent tracks, or top tracks, etc).
|
|