|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-14-2012, 06:18 AM | #11 (permalink) |
Front to Back
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 360
|
I normally don't like to label music-- usually that's done by record companies to market bands, so I normally try to stay away from stamping one label on a band because they rarely are the pure representation of that label. I was interested in King Crimson, though.
On the grunge label that I originally wrote, I read an article several years ago that said that King Crimson's sound in their 73-74 period was very "grungy" not to be compared with the grunge bands of the early 90's... just that it was very "grungy" sounding, with which I still somewhat agree; however, the word has way too many connotations to bands like Nirvana to used, so I should have never used that adjective to start with. Here are my final labels, with the help of IL Duce: Period 1- "In the Court," "Poseidon," "Lizard," "Islands" (original progressive rock) Period 2- "Larks' Tongues in Aspic," "Starless and Bible Black," "Red" (improvisational proto-progressive metal) Period 3- "Discipline," "Beat," "Three of a Perfect Pair" (progressive new wave) Period 4- "THRAK," "The Construction of Light," "The Power to Believe" (industrial and avant-garde progressive metal) |
01-14-2012, 10:11 AM | #12 (permalink) | ||
Horribly Creative
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-14-2012, 10:29 AM | #13 (permalink) | |
Front to Back
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 360
|
Quote:
So, for the sake of conversation, how would you classify "Lizard" and "Islands"? |
|
|