Foo Fighters - Echoes, Silence, Patience and Grace (lyrics, bass) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The MB Reader > Album Reviews
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-13-2008, 10:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9
Default Foo Fighters - Echoes, Silence, Patience and Grace

Foo Fighters - Echoes, Silence, Patience and Grace


There is no doubt that the Foo Fighters are one of the artists that have shaped the current generation of music, and are future rock legends. 2005’s “In Your Honor” was an above average modern rock album, but was somewhat a letdown after all the hype that had surrounded it. Foo Fighters’ latest offering, 2007’s “Echoes, Silence, Patience and Grace sees the band sticking to the old formula that has worked for them time after time, while also taking their music to a whole new level, testing the boundaries of their musical ability.

The Pretender - A made-for-radio masterpiece that has all the makings of a hit single. A great showcase of the band’s ability, especially Chris Shiflett. 8/10

Let it Die - A beautiful song with amazing lyrics and another brilliant display of Shiflett’s playing ability. The song is built up from a melodic acoustic progression, into a massive heavy rock anthem. This is without a doubt one of the best songs on the album. 7.5/10

Erase/Replace - Easily the best song on “Echoes”, and possibly one of the best they have ever written. The song is so simple, yet so catchy and just pure brilliance. 10/10

Long Road To Ruin - A good listen, but it doesn’t have the “wow factor” that many of the other tracks had, though Hawkins manages to make this track slightly memorable with some pretty cool drumbeats, and the guitar solo, although very short, is quite good as well. 6/10

Come Alive - A nice, easy listening track, but there’s too many similarities to “Let it Die” for it to be called a standout. 6/10

Stranger Things Have Happened – Another great track. The lyrics are some of the best I’ve heard. 7/10

Cheer Up, Boys – Worst track on the album. It just isn’t catchy, and not good technically either. Seems more like a B-side. 3/10

Summer’s End – A laid back track with surf-rock style guitar. It’s a really nice song. 7.5/10

Ballad of The Beaconsfield miners – A brilliant display of the ability of both Grohl and Shiflett. The story behind the song is very touching as well. 9/10

Statues – Another awesome song. Slow with a thick instrumental texture, and some powerful lyrics. 9.5/10

But, Honestly – The awesome guitar riffs, beats and vocal melody is tarnished by almost transparent bass lines that might as well not even be there. 7/10

Home – AMAZING! Absolute brilliance. This is one of the most amazing songs I have ever heard. The piano melody is beautiful and Grohl’s voice somehow manages to be extremely soft, but at the same time awesomely powerful. The violin is also really nice. 10/10

Tracks to hear:
The Pretender
Erase/Replace
Ballad of the Beaconsfield Miners
Statues
Home

Tracks to skip:
Cheer Up, Boys
Long Road To Ruin
Come Alive

Overall Rating: 8/10
andy_chalmers_102 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 10:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

Can't say the Foo Fighters are anything more than generic modern rock, but nice review. Although it's pretty ridiculous to call them future rock legends...
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 10:20 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered Jimmy Rustler
 
Dr_Rez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,360
Default

I love the Foo Fighters as much as the next guy, but they havnt shaped $hit, and they are certainly not testing any boundaries. To say so would be ill informed and naive.


edit: I would edit that post or delete it so your first one isnt a total blunder.
__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew*
*Always Checks Credentials Crew*
*nba > nfl crew*
*Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew*
Dr_Rez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 12:46 AM   #4 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 7
Default

The Foo Fighters are pretty good... but yeah... I would have to agree, there are many other bands that are more deserving of that kind of a title. I mean... there good but give it a rest.
Nightstrikes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 01:41 AM   #5 (permalink)
I'm sorry, is this Can?
 
Comus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,989
Default

Can't say I agree at all with your views, especially your choices of tracks to skip considering they're some of the best. Also, track by track reviews are amateur, sure you should review it chronologically if you plan to do any length larger than a few paragraphs, but not giving individual song ratings.

Also I'd rather Foo Fighters be the future rock legends considering everything else on the mainstream charts.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleepy jack
Quote:
Originally Posted by antonio
classical music isn't exactly religious, you know?
um
last.fm
Comus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 08:27 AM   #6 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Comus View Post
track by track reviews are amateur, sure you should review it chronologically if you plan to do any length larger than a few paragraphs, but not giving individual song ratings.
And why is it amateur...? Because professional reviewers do NOT do it?
Rainard Jalen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 09:07 AM   #7 (permalink)
I'm sorry, is this Can?
 
Comus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,989
Default

No, professional reviewers do it as well and each time I read a song-by-song I shudder because albums are not about the songs, they're about the album as a whole.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleepy jack
Quote:
Originally Posted by antonio
classical music isn't exactly religious, you know?
um
last.fm
Comus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 09:09 AM   #8 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

Amateurism aside reviews that discuss the albums as a whole are much more interesting to read than song by song because they're a good deal less repetitive especially when we're talking about a band like the Foo Fighters who are hardly Primal Scream.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 09:24 AM   #9 (permalink)
I'm sorry, is this Can?
 
Comus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,989
Default

I'll review it as I do next week sometime if I can be arsed and we'll see.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleepy jack
Quote:
Originally Posted by antonio
classical music isn't exactly religious, you know?
um
last.fm
Comus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 09:48 AM   #10 (permalink)
Fish in the percolator!
 
Seltzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hobbit Land NZ
Posts: 2,870
Default

I think track-by-tracks can be good as well, as long as you give some kind of overview and illustrate the continuity between tracks. It depends also on what you're reviewing - some albums just simply don't have enough going on to justify a track-by-track.
__________________
Seltzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.