Assuming I'm accusing her of being a sellout is begging the question. All I said was that she changed her image for commercial means, and that her new image presents a woman who is morbidly skinny.
That's all, it's something feminists have been rallying against for years. I don't see how it becomes a bias at all to criticize an musician for using non-musical means to seek attention, and focus. Does it make her music worse? No, but her music is dated, and as dated as it remains, always resembles as a forced relative undercurrent of society.She didn't just start working with 'some guy'. The man isn't just 'some guy'. She went to him specifically to invent a character for her, get her videos funded, and producer her CD. That was his job, he's the guy you go to when you want to become a star.
I mean, if this was politics, and I was a democrat, would it be unreasonable that I continue to peruse a troubling issue brought up by republicans? Fact of the matter is, music is political, and as long as Gaga is talked about, and in the spotlight, I think it's fair for anyone to have a say, regardless of the weight of the opinions.
__________________
Quote:
|
Terence Hill, as recently confirmed during an interview to an Italian TV talk-show, was offered the role but rejected it because he considered it "too violent". Dustin Hoffman and John Travolta declined the role for the same reason. When Al Pacino was considered for the role of John Rambo, he turned it down when his request that Rambo be more of a madman was rejected.
|
Al Pacino = God
|