Music Banter - View Single Post - 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles
View Single Post
Old 12-20-2010, 08:01 AM   #11 (permalink)
Necromancer
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Axiomatic Wiki View Post
I think the two bands are not really comparable. Beatles are a lot of things, but they are not what the Stones are, Hard Rock. The only things they have in common are their time periods and the impact they had on music. Anyone who prefers hard rock to psychedelic pop will most likely like the stones better, where as vice versa, would probably prefer The Beatles. Their styles are so different, and they were both innovates and masters of their styles of music.
That said, I definitely prefer The Beatles ^_^
Good post, except I prefer The Stones.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RingotheRat View Post
1. Keith Richards , coolest guitarist on the planet- Coolest maybe but George Harrison is still tehcnically better so your point is void in my eyes. He played the first backwards guitar on 'I'm Only Sleeping' how does Richards compare to that?
Harrison's style may be more technical in theory, Richards style is more R&B/blues, basic old school Rock & Roll. Both are equal as popular guitarist.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote