Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonlitSunshine
I believe it's possible that he is so because he's so badly represented by the militant atheists. Similar to how the militant theists let the other side down...
|
Problem with the militant atheists is that they miss the point of Dawkins' argument, which isn't anything to do with religion in reality, but science and reason versus superstition. His major corpus of works isn't even religiously-based, he's a scientist and aims to explain differing concepts in a Darwinian framework, ONE of which is religion.