Deconstructionism comes to music. The problem with a "nothing is nothing" argument is that if we all agree on it, you've only created an ash-pile for things to grow from.
Without parameters through which we view things, you can't have anything. I don't mean to revisit overused arguments, but without borders there aren't exclusions. It comes up on the idea of utopia, and those are always dystopic. It seems you're pointing out that everything is everything.
Or did I miss something?
|