08-30-2010, 12:32 AM
|
#298 (permalink)
|
FakingSuicideForApplause
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: I live in a van down by the river
Posts: 1,365
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Consolator
It really depends on your music taste. I'm a big fan of dance music as well as electronic music, so I can tolerate most of what the radio plays. Beiber does poppy stuff, I gave his album a listen and Baby was the only song I liked. I loathed Ke$ha and Lady Gaga when I heard their first singles. Ke$ha grew on me after Your Love Is My Drug, and I realized that Gaga isn't a talentless whore aftering looking up her live acoustic performances (well, she is a whore, but a supremely talented whore, I shouldn't be one to judge.) And I fell head over heels in love with Gaga's second album, which is a mix of industrial dance music and pop music that isn't so lyrically shallow like her first album.
I listen to the mainstream pop radios on my lengthy commute to University everyday, though if my car had a CD player, I'd probably never listen to the radio. The lame commercials annoy me much more than the actual music. I generally check out radio artist's CD's when they're released, just to make sure I'm not missing some random gem of a song.
Edit, response to the previous post: Did you not read the previous page at all? You're right, I have not been here for long, but you have to understand from the point of a newcomer, the comments on the previous page were (at the very least) giving off the impression that you all were bitter elitist peeps who were anti-mainstream. "I've evolved past the radio and proud to say that I don't listen to it." What kind of crap is that? That is the EXACT same thing that the snooty little hipsters I knew would say, thinking they're the absolute **** because they're listening to some band that no one knows, and aren't "conforming" to the radio. If that's what gives you an ego boost, fine.
I have absolutely no problem with someone wanting to listen to music with more substance than pop music. I thought I pointed that out in one of my last posts. In fact, it disappoints me that a lot of pop music today revolves around partying/sex/alcohol/whatever. I could give you a long list of the things that I wish were different about pop music. That isn't what this is about though. This is about people generalizing and making blatant assumptions about something they haven't heard. I loathe most food, but am willing to try everything that's handed to me once. I guess it comes down to nothing more than opposing viewpoints. I may not like a lot of pop songs I hear, but there are always a few that I end up really liking. To me, it's worth the time going through and finding my favorites. To you, it may not be, and that's fine -- it's the **** attitude towards popular things I don't like.
|
Honestly, it quite sounds like you're the narrow minded with respect to music. And as has been said before, why listen to an album where the singles off of it are complete and utter rubbish, but catchy if at all anything. It's nonsensical and counter-productive to engage in that type of behaviour. And what's this about evolving past the radio? Stupid statement to make at any rate. Finding music you love on your own makes listening to it all the more worth it in my opinion, instead of just droning out and listening to whatever you're hearing at the moment and taking it with a smile on your face, then think..."Wait, this song... it isn't good. Maybe I should give the rest of that person's album a listen." Besides, why waste time on music like that when I can listen to something beautiful like this?
And give Pet Sounds a listen, seeing as your such a pop music enthusiast.
__________________
I'll stay if I ever could, and pick up your pieces babe, because there's never a perfect day.
|
|
|