Music Banter - View Single Post - The Official Radiohead Thread
View Single Post
Old 07-10-2010, 10:22 PM   #1 (permalink)
debaserr
eat the masters
 
debaserr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr dave View Post
nope. i've said it many times before in other threads. Kid A was meh, too much 'experimenting' for the sake of being 'experimental' and not enough about writing great songs.

i put Kid A and Amnesiac on the same level as the Use Your Illusion albums by GnR, only Radiohead got lucky and didn't implode following the release of their hubris. basically they're both two albums that really REALLY should have only been one. strip the filler from both and put all the good stuff on one disc and you would have had a GREAT album from start to finish, no skipping, and tons of material for b-sides/rarities/collectibles for the hardcore fans.

and the whole angle that Kid A was a great step forward for both the band and listeners reflects rather poorly on the listener.
let me get this straight. this is because you have much better opinions than others right?

i do agree about how amnesiac/kid a should have been combined though. looking through them i would remove:

pulk/pull revolving doors
one of the morning bells i forget which i prefer.
hunting bears
treefingers
motion picture soundtrack

the rest are arguable but those are shitty.
__________________
Last.FM
debaserr is offline   Reply With Quote