Quote:
Originally Posted by zevokes
and regarding those patents and their legitimacy: i think it would be wise to note that there are over 4000 patents at the US patent office involving devices of this nature. for one thing, you don't get patents for things that don't work. secondly, the financial elite know how the world has to work in order for them to retain any of their power, and free energy is not part of that imagined paradigm.
|
Zevokes, people actually can and do get patents for devices that don't work or have never been created such that they can't be tested. As an example, from the wikipedia page on perpetual motion machines:
Quote:
|
On March 26, 2002, the Motionless Electrical Generator (MEG) was patented (U.S. Patent 6362718) by five inventors: Stephen L. Patrick, Thomas E. Bearden, James C. Hayes, James L. Kenny, and Kenneth D. Moore. There is as yet no working prototype, and in 2006, Bearden claimed he still needed 10 to 12 million dollars to develop a commercial product based on the technology[134].
|
I haven't read a lot yet about the Bendini Monopole Generator in order to point out the precise flaws in the assumption that it is creating free energy, but from what I have read it appears to simply be a device that can be used to charge batteries, no more and no less.
Any machine that supposedly violates known laws of thermodynamics should be viewed with suspicion. A *lot* of suspicion. And that is an understatement.
