Quote:
Originally Posted by Malicious Wakizashi
How does the law of reflection relate to Sartre's concept of Anguish?
Is Fichte's freedom an objective freedom or does he suppose it so?
Are truth and freedom interchangeable?
Is transcendental idealism certain?
Does transcendental idealism suppose that we retain impressions of representations of things-in-themselves? In other words does it suppose their existence?
What exactly does Fichte mean by intuition?
Does Fichte suppose that I am somehow different than my object?
Does the ability to lobotomize or place another in a coma refute Fichte's principals of absolute freedom, of I as consciousness, acting freely.
Consciousness is a function of consciousness. Absurd proposal?
Can we know that of which consciousness is a function? Though we cannot know to what we are connected, can we feel connected?
I is not I; it means nothing, it is Tathata, da-da, or Dadaism. Conversely, "I am I." And I and I think thats just right, Jah.
The grounds zijn er niet; they are not there, one must have faith in a Self beyond the ego and give in to it or have one's tongue tied extrapolating the grounds.
|
Much better :P and im not being fececious either. Of course if you turned that in you would fail...why? because you haven't actually answered or attempted to answer anything. Whether or not it actually makes sense...well i wouldn't know considering i know nothing of Fichte or anything you are really talking about in there. HOWEVER, despite your attempt at lovely sarcasm by editing your work into such a ridiculous hippy-fied overly voiced piece of musing, you have actually succeeded in something more closely resembeling higher level thinking, which is good. Obviously your passion, at least for the present, is seated at a cynicality towards....well im not exactly sure, but the point is, when you write with a purpose and with a passion (even if that passion is to make a fool of me, which is fine) your writing WILL improve. Brava.