Quote:
Originally Posted by Malicious Wakizashi
Let me know what you think of this
Fichte's presupposition that “if the I itself is to be, in turn, an object of our consciousness, then a Not-I must be posited,” is religious because he affirms a transcendent reality.
Transcendental idealism supposes a 'first action' of positing a state of repose, which is presented as a series of actions; none other than power. Subjective intentionality and the law of reflection underlie the personal aspects of an experience of inactivity leading to experience of the I. Fichte's transition of activity to determinable activity moves concept to intuition. Fichte strides with faith supposing absolute freedom for the grounds of the transition. Fichte's ideal activity is false in that nothing exists for the I thanks to ideal activity; ideal activity and I are subjectively cultivated from nothing, neither can exist as a determined concept.
|
Hmmm... partly it was just really hard for me to read just because of the subject matter...but mostly the sentence structure just didn't do it for me. I mean that it seems like a rather typical "this is this because" type paragraph, the kind you might be forced to write for a class and which it is blatently obvious that you struggled to write. For this reason, despite the advanced vocabulary, it seemed rather low level writing to me. especially that first sentence: "is religious because" just kind of made me shudder. It definitely has potential, but maybe practice writing with passion things that you aren't quite so passionate about. It will probably improve your writing tenfold.
__________________
"Not remotely! Because iocaine comes from Australia, as everyone knows. And Australia is entirely peopled with criminals. And criminals are used to having people not trust them as you are not trusted by me, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you."
|