Music Banter - View Single Post - The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles
View Single Post
Old 06-08-2009, 11:01 PM   #5 (permalink)
Neapolitan
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by almauro View Post
Lennon, to his credit, submarined the whole Beatlemania enterprise, by doing an album, like Beggars Banquet,
wrong! The Rolling Stones did Beggars Banquet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by almauro View Post
of stripped-down and blues rock and folk oriented songs, which failed to produce the type of feel-good pop single from previous albums.
Hold on let me get my fishing boots on, OK I'm back, I glad I got them on because you are really shoveling the **** tonight, Wait a minute, what do you call Ob La Di Ob La Da? If that ain't feel good pop then what is?????? You are talking like you never listened to The Beatles aka The White Album, dude.

Quote:
Originally Posted by almauro View Post
Ironically, they too became threatening with songs like "Helter Skelter" "Revolution" 'Happiness is a Warm Gun" and others. Instead of comforting fans, The Beatles made them uncomfortable. Songs like "Revolution 9" scared the sh___t out of those little kids.
Unless you admit right now that you are 51 y/o and it was you that got the "sh___t" scared out of, then it's all a long yarn you've just woven.

Quote:
Originally Posted by almauro View Post
To compare the the change of musical directions experienced between earlier albums to this is ridiculous, and completely naive.
Did you ever heard any of The Beatle's earlier work? probably not.
If you don't think "Tomorrow Never Knows" is the cat's pajamas and revolutionary for it's time, then you're an olive short of a pizza.

Quote:
Originally Posted by almauro View Post
The media, feeling betrayed, no longer gave them as much coverage nor good reviews, the fans became disenchanted. Whether they chose to perform or not, was completely inconsequential.
What???? Hold on, I gotta get some duck tape, I have tape my head before my brain explodes all over my moniter, because that is the dumbest thing I ever heard, Hold on I'll be back.... slosh, slosh, slosh, slosh, slosh.



OK I'm back, oh yeah, all the sloshing you heard is from the sh___t you shoveling my way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by almauro View Post
They simply weren't lovable anymore.
What do you call Yellow Submarine?? An Unlovable cartoon?

Quote:
Originally Posted by almauro View Post
They became "Stones-like".
That's only because Billy Preston played piano for the both of them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by almauro View Post
I'm eternally grateful for John Lennon, in making this grand artistic statement.
What grand artistic statement was that? Wait don't tell me because I'll be externally ungrateful to hear any more ****.

Quote:
Originally Posted by almauro View Post
If you can appreciate his intense desire to distance himself as a artist from the Beatles past, then you can better understand his decision to undertake the weirdness he created with Yoko.
When you say "undertake the weirdness he created with Yoko" are you talking about in the bedroom or in the recording studio???

Quote:
Originally Posted by almauro View Post
But I believe he made that decision to break from the past, before meeting her, so blaming her for the break up of the Beatles is ridiculous as well.
You're ridiculous as well, Oko Yono was a wet blanket that added extra stress to the already strained, interpersonalrelationship of members of The Beatles, and beside she kept John Lennon from joining up with his ol' bandmates once the dust settled in the 70's. I like her and everything, but that doesn't mean I don't think she had absolutely no part in the untimely demise of The Beatles.
Neapolitan is offline