Ethan, does everytime that someone gives their subjective opinion regarding an artist you like mean they have to back it up with sources? I could count many instances of you making blunt, slanderous remarks regarding many artists.
And you should know why people are reluctant to argue with you, you tend to get harsher at people who actually do bother to explain their opinions to you.
Forums are weird, it seems that the more polite people try to be when criticizing artists, the more angry their fanboys get.
Ethan, you're constantly asking us to prove our subjective opinions. But what about you? You've made many ridiculous remarks about Led Zeppelin, I've spent 30 minutes on ridiculously long posts giving out many details about their so called stolen songs that biased Zep haters just ignore. I may have been acting like an obsessed fanboy, but at least I took the time to explain my opinions. You basically responded with quotes from biased websites and narrow attacks and complete disregard of facts, especially when you made statements like "all of Jimmy Pages riffs are stolen".
Now I know you, and I know that now you want to bring up Modest Mouse, and say that makes me a hypocrite, maybe it does but this is another thing about you that annoys me, you always desperately try to dig up examples of me being hypocritical, often when it's not even relevant to the discussion, because I'm not the one who flips out over people making only a few slight criticisms of an artist I like, I'm not the one who says people shouldn't slander musicians they don't like EVER. Me doing the same things you do is not relevant at all.
When I say something that's true, calling me a hypocrite doesn't undo the fact that it's true.
|