Originally Posted by draven

Again people making up numbers, you really do need to get your facts straight. The Joshua tree sold 10m in the usa. You need to stop pulling numbers out of your a$$ when you have no clue what you are talking about.

Guns n roses were the biggest band in the world from 87/88-93, you cannot even dispute that, I have already proven it but you still deny it, its becoming comical. As for those bands selling more albums than gnr, that is true but like I stated before gnr only have 3 real studio albums and one EP yet vs all those bands that have atleast 10 albums each, yet they are right up there as one of the best selling bands ever.

Like I also said, gnr were bigger than all of those bands (Elvis doesnt count because he is not a band).

The funny thing is you still have not even given once ounce of proof that nirvana was bigger than guns n roses in the 90s which is what this debate is really about, not if gnr were the biggest band since the beatles, since I changed what I said and restated it as they were one of the biggest bands since the beatles.

So stop making up numbers and tell me how nirvana was bigger than gnr in the 90s?