Quote:
Originally Posted by Kamikazi Kat
Hmmm... If the explanation for the universe is God, then the explanation for the existance of God is something, and the explanation to the existance of that something is something else, and the explanation to that something else could be a different something, and the explanation for the existance of the previous something could be something else, and the explanation for that could be something else, ect, ect.
You know what, screw this.
|
You already did.
But to Tore, I understand what you mean when you speak of probabilities and randomness in regard to quantum physics. But I have trouble accepting that it's not possible that we
just don't currently know the causality behind the unexplainable happenings in quantum sciences. This is to say that there could be a rational cause to the effects we're looking at as random.
Regardless of how far we think we are and how much we think we know, there is invariably a perception-changing discovery around every corner.
I mean that to tie into the cosmological argument for
causality. It seems natural to me to assume that something exists because there were two things prior: The condition for something to exist, and the physical creation of its existence, by whatever means fitting.
Although I do not apply laws of physics that are native to our reality when viewing possible processes taking place
prior to the creation of the universe, I do apply logic to the overall understanding of what I observe and learn as a reasoning human being.