Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo
I do notice that. I could imagine the scalp becomes rather sticky after you shave it (after lathering with shaving cream).
Bah, I knew someone would say that, har har. Don't tell me you wouldn't hit that though. I know you would if she had hair, she's as beautiful as any Indian model, so why should having no hair make any difference?
I honestly don't get the big deal over organic fibers growing on your head that don't serve much of a vital purpose and can grow back in just a few weeks. Yet another example of common sense that doesn't actually make sense. Especially since men seem to have free control over their hair and nobody cares, and women are expected to be hairless everywhere but in one place, just to meet a specific personal preference. Why is it that women have to be up for anything? (Guys with long hair, short hair, no hair, weird hair) yet men have to be so goddamn specific about how women should look? It makes no sense. Hair is something people should have fun with.
Speaking of Indian models, Shilpa Shetty is gonna shave her head for a film role. My prayers have been answered, I can't wait.  |
Honestly, I think hair contributes to my sexual attraction to a woman. I dunno why. But I do know that when I think back to the 80's, then the 90's, then now, I see the progression as being sexy on an up-swing. The faces of human females haven't changed, and not taking into account their clothing styles, the only thing else that makes it is the hair.
I can't imagine seeing a today's hot girl sporting an 80's hair style. It detracts from her hotness. I don't know why. I wish I weren't that shallow, but it actually has an impact on the attractiveness of women for me.
Maybe it's the media's portrayal of what's hot and what's not. Maybe it's just a gradual softening to how women are changing. I don't know. All I know is that 80's hair is not hot. And to me, bald chicks aren't either.
But that's just me.