Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer_sam
He got more to the point than Rush Limbaugh did. I was watching his speech earlier and his definition led him to say that "conservatives...like people." I honestly hope that Limbaugh doesn't overextend his hand in the Republican party; he's a polarizing figure and his larger involvement in the party could only hope to act divisively.
If the Republican party hopes to actually be a contender for the next elections they need to start composing legitimate campaigns and stop these horrendous publicity stunts. This kid might have known what he was talking about for the two minutes he spoke but it only takes a fifteen minute Wikipedia lesson to reach the same conclusion as him.
|
Rush Limbaugh has been involved in the party and overextended his hand since the 1990s. He was largely responsible for the "Republican Revolution" of 1994 and Reagan, upon his retirement, dubbed Limbaugh the number one voice for conservatism in America. Even Michael Steele, the head of the Republican National Convention, had to apologize for criticizing him. Which was ironic considering he was responding to Rahm Emanuel who basically said everyone in the Republican party was Limbaugh's bitch.
Anyway the next four, possibly eight, years will be good for Limbaugh just like the nineties were. I'm convinced he votes Democratic, he was never so successful as when he had Bill Clinton to attack and the beginning of his relationship with Obama is proving to be just the same.