Quote:
Originally Posted by thegoldlaw
This is gold.. if they had a good line like Oklahoma then they should be putting up 60 per game like oklahoma. Bradford has years to throw the ball and does. If USC's line is so good then how come none of their players stand out, or for that matter any of their total game stats ? and dont you DARE say the PAC 10 has good defense, may I remind you they are 1-15 OOC outside of USC.
|
Because they have three backs who've rushed for over 600 yards this year. They're extremely balanced offensively, they don't throw deep every other play like Oklahoma and they don't run up the score like said team. I"m not saying their as good an offensive team as the Sooners, but their line is just as good and their defense is on an entirely different level. It's ridiculous and illogical to assume that because they don't have gaudy offensive numbers their line isn't as good as the Sooners.
Quote:
|
None that were 11-0, none that had beaten people at the time. I only mention the other victories because you say florida has been a junk schedule. When compared to USC its alot harder.
|
I never said they had a junk schedule. Florida has the better signature victory, but USC has a stronger schedule overall. I'd say it's even. Instead of bull****ting about how much stronger the SEC is, you know, just because, why don't you look at their actual SOS.
Quote:
|
I started to follow USC when Palmer got there and ever since him its been a high octane offense. USC is falling off hard this year with sanchez
|
So? Your point? They haven't needed to score in bunches. Yet again with the double standards, what's different for Bama? Oh yeh, they're exempt because they play in the SEC. Never mind USC has a superior running and passing game.