Originally Posted by lucifer_sam

So beheadings and animal tortures aside, the WORST thing you could think of is a toddler who forgot to put on a pair of pantaloons before his gramma snapped a picture of him? Bit convoluted sense of moarlity, don't you think?

I always wondered where the line between cheeky fun and child pornography stood. I'm pretty sure my family have entire albums devoted to pictures of me overenthusiastically swinging my naked self around. Don't misinterpret me, though--people who abuse children should be hung by their entrails. I just don't understand what constitutes the difference between kiddie porn and a toddler who refuses to wear clothes.