Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger
I don't think anyone has ever looked at an album like Blonde on Blonde or Revolver or Pet Sounds in an objective way.
They're albums that struck a chord with people at the right time in the right place both musically & socially ,and are fondly remembered for doing so , that's why they are regarded so highly. They're not regarded highly because someone looked at them and decided they were the finest example of music ever made and then decreeing it to everybody.
|
I can see where you're coming from, that an artist's or album's influence at a certain time certainly biases its reputation (Elvis Presley, anyone?), but one could make an argument that, since the Beatles and Bob Dylan
consistantly capture the imagination of multiple generations, their music has some sort of inherent staying power. (I'm playing devil's advocate here, but I'm really interested in responses to this).
Still, like jackjammer said, the problem is that some critics do seem to judge from a detached base, which ruins the purpose of music. No one listens to an album because it's "good"; we listen to music because we can relate to it.
If it is possible to objectively judge music (and I don't think it is), that exercise has no purpose.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger
I think there's a lot to be said for music journalism when it comes to articles & interviews. I've just never had any time for reviews.
If I write one I use it as a platform to say why I like it or dislike it. Looking at it in an objective way is not something I have ever even given any thought to. I mean why would I?
To do that i'd have to approach it from a distance and thats not why I listen to music. I want to share how a piece of music has affected me , not to break it down into little components and lecture people.
|
The only music reviews worth reading are ones that focus on the author's personal experience, imo (parts of Greil Marcus' "Stranded," this book called "This Is Uncool" by Gary Mulholland, etc). The reviews that try to place music in a social context and analyze its political effects (Dave Marsh, Jon Landau, etc) annoy me to no end.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fruitonica
I would say that some people have more credible opinions, but in the end it still all subjective.
|
How do some people have more credible opinions (and how do you tell?)? Perhaps experience (i.e., listening to
lots of music), but as you said, it's still subjective (and listening to a lot of music would only tend to further bias one's opinions, I would think).