Quote:
Originally Posted by Oomph!
No, you've completely conceeded because you know you're wrong and your compensating for this by calling me names.
We left off at punk is an anti-corporate, anti establishment movement and pop is a corporate enforcing, establishment building movement, making them contradictions. After that, you realized I was right so you guys collectively decided to to jabber on about complete nonsense to distract yourselves from your own intellectual shortcommings and to shelter your inflated ego from enduring the pain of, god-forbid, being wrong.
Prove my little analysis to be false by actually debating like an adult instead of childish name calling and semantical side-stepping, what do you say?
|
See the problem with that is pop isn't what you said it is as has been pointed out and said and you refuse to believe this and completely ignore it because you're wrapped up in being a rebellious nu-metalheaded git who can't take the fact that pop isn't all Britney Spears. I'm not the one side-stepping you're the one who doesn't listen to people if they don't agree with your opinion. You've been argued on this several times and you just repeat the same thing over and over, stop trying to stand on a moral high horse about this because there's two things here: you're too stupid to comprehend what people are saying and don't know how to argue or you just don't like it when people disagree with you so you refuse to accept it as truth.