Quote:
Originally Posted by The-Starving-Artless
how so?
he couldn't just take a picture because people see pictures all the time. big deal. its the idea that you go into the art gallery and actually see the dog starving in front of you. the very idea that the dog was chained up in an art gallery is enough for it to be cruelty, just seeing a picture of some starving dog on the street is "sad", but not "cruelty"... so no one gets uppity about it and the artist doesn't get his point across
|
HOW is he being a hypocrite? Are you pretending to be stupid?
He is trying to show how no one cares about a starving dog so he, himself, starves a dog? I can think of a hundred other ways to get across a similar message. How about he invites people to an animal shelter to show off all the animals there?
Anything can be ****ing art these days. Ridiculous. Let's slaughter some babies and called it anti abortionist.