Music Banter - View Single Post - 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles

ProggyMan · 04-05-2008, 12:10 AM

The Beatles made trends, they didn't follow them: The Beatles were real, uh, trendsetters.

The Beatles were more diverse: They've dabbled in quite a variety of stuff. The Stones...Haven't. Not to say they quite deserve the 'blues cover band' comment I saw somewhere, but they stick to what they're good at.

RS 1: So...
RS 2: Listen to the riff in She Said She Said and then tell me the Beatles didn't have good riffs.
RS 3: Lol.

B 1: Jagger sang about what he knew, which was drugs, sex and booze. Nothing wrong with that.

04-05-2008, 12:10 AM	#91 (permalink)
ProggyMan Reformed Jackass Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 3,964	The Beatles made trends, they didn't follow them: The Beatles were real, uh, trendsetters. The Beatles were more diverse: They've dabbled in quite a variety of stuff. The Stones...Haven't. Not to say they quite deserve the 'blues cover band' comment I saw somewhere, but they stick to what they're good at. RS 1: So... RS 2: Listen to the riff in She Said She Said and then tell me the Beatles didn't have good riffs. RS 3: Lol. B 1: Jagger sang about what he knew, which was drugs, sex and booze. Nothing wrong with that.