Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill
You're still sounding like one of those kids. I would try and have a discussion with you but it's pretty obvious you care more about being so cool and elitist then hearing someone else's opinion and guess what? I find Cynic boring. No amount of inaccurate generalizations about my taste or going on about their technical prowess is going to change that.
|
How am I trying to be cool? I'm pointing out that you simply don't have to background to discuss things on this level. You can find Cynic boring if you want. I really don't understand how. Nor does the vast majority of those with a musical education.
and jackhammer I don't see how I went on a tangent. You said that modern music is built off the blues. I agree. However since the origin of this whole discussion was my assertion that emotion in music can only truly carry the weight it was meant to for the writer only, I felt compelled to give my reasoning and then state how your logic did not apply to what I was talking about.
I'll relate this to another medium of art; painting. If a painter painted exactly with emotion, odds are you'd end up with something Pollack-ish. However, if time went into the planning, composition, study, and technique of the painting, you'd end up with some Rembrandt-ish.
Emotion in music is a fine starting place, but with out real ability, it's worthless
and just to clarify, when I use the term technical, I'm not talking about mile a minute sweeps. That Cynic video is a prime example. Odd chord shapes coupled with counterpoint vocal melody create a layered effect that appeals to me in the pure aesthetic sense as well as the mathematical one.