Quote:
|
No your wrong, the reason why we have the Madonnas and Timberlakes has nothing to do with MJ. Why do you keep blaming the state of the music industry on MJ? its bull. The reason why we have so many Timberlakes aka "Michael Jacksons clones" because there is no real talent. Their still at the stage where you imitate an artist your influenced by and they don't push to be INNOVATIVE. There impersonaters and a water down version of the real thing. There is no real talent which leads me to why there is so many Madonnas. For the record, Madonna is aight but she is overrated but getting on point, Madonna really can't sing but she did what she had to do to get on top. She had the appeal charisma and the right producers, song writers to produce her stuff for her. So that kinda started a trend thats why so much is not taken seriously any more in the music world. Real music doesn't matter and if you have the right look and you appeal to alot of people, who cares if your song sounds terrible or if you can't exactly sing. They give out grammies like its candy to anybody, its ridiculous. I'm not blaming HER but I can see ur point. I don't think its MJ fault either. I think its because its been a decline in people wanting good music and people making good music. The record companies sign anybody now, its sad. MJ wrote his OWN songs, his OWN hits and when him and Q had a divorced produced his own stuff. Mike was fair game and was in the biz since he was 5, by the time he started workin with Q he could have produced OTW,BAD, Thriller by his self but he WANTED to work with Q. In BAD, anyway he was really into producing the tracks with Q.
|
Madonna sucks, she has no talent. I don't understand how you can say shes "aight" and admit she doesn't sing. Seeing as she doesn't produce or write anything, she's essentially an object for the music industry to use however they please. Madonna didn't do s
hit, she'd be nowhere without her record label oh and once again, please stop making sweeping generalizations about the current state of music because you've shown you don't really know much about it at all.
I am so tired of talentless pop artists getting credit while better artists and bands sit here unnoticed. You sit there and preach about how great Michael Jackson is and place him alongside Marvin G
aye and Stevie Wonder but if Michael Jackson had never showed up the great bands of today wouldn't be affected in the slightest. If Michael Jackson never showed up the big four would've found some other black guy turned white pedophile to push down our throats for thirty years and Rolling Stone would've found another 80s pop album to put on their 500 to look open-minded or just keep going on about "back in the day." I am so tired of hearing about how great Thriller was, it wasn't great. It was a boring pop album, it wasn't timeless. The only thing timeless about Michael Jackson is his reliance on better producers and writers to make popular records, not even good records, just popular ones.