Music Banter - View Single Post - Who Sux More? NickleBack or Puddle Of Mudd
View Single Post
Old 01-25-2007, 06:15 AM   #154 (permalink)
littleknowitall
Pow!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,673
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jibber View Post
nickelback songs are f*cking easy as hell to sing. Like someone else said, they've got a very shallow range. Any drunken hick in a kareokee bar can sound the same as nickelback. all you have to do is smoke for a few hours so your vocal chords are good and shot, then force the words out in a gravely half-scream, and voila! you are now the newest half-a**ed eddy vedder clone!
I stand by my claim, i've seen them live and the guy sang like a demon, and after listening in depth to nickelback some of his songs ARE vocally impressive, plus the range hardly can be considered the basis for how well he sings, i like his voice, some people say it sounds a bit put on, but when i think of voices like that i think more along the line of the phonics and i rate Kroegers voice far more so, i just wouldn't dismiss him as a vocalist and Ethan i've heard you sing and i'd hardly compare you to Kroeger, i can't believe anyone would go as far as to call him a karaoke singer. ****IN' RIDICULOUS I SAY!
littleknowitall is offline