Music Banter - View Single Post - The Official Grunge Thread
View Single Post
Old 01-07-2007, 11:46 PM   #182 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ?
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo View Post
In other words critical acclaim and an independent label determines weither or not a band is in it for the music and not the money, thats essentially what you are saying.

And grunge, while hardly significant by todays standards, was a credible musical movement, it is by no means one of the worst things to have happened to music, you need to save that term for something far more deserving, like brit pop.
Perhaps you should read a whole arguement rather than just take a quote out of context.
It was the original poster who claimed that grunge musicians wanted to stay obscure

Now if you are in a band and not in it for the money obviously you would sign to an indie label.
So I asked him to give me examples of critically acclaimed (not just by critics ) independant albums.

Whats so hard to understand about that?
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote