Music Banter - View Single Post - The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles
View Single Post
Old 09-01-2006, 05:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
ShadowSurfer
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Side II of Band Of Gypsies
Posts: 310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger
I`m not so sure thats true.

The Stones were always a blues based band who played pop/rock , maybe with a couple of blues/soul covers thrown in . They experimented with psychadelia on Satanic Majesties & Flowers but when it was obvious that didn`t really suit them they pretty much went back to what they knew with Beggers Banquet & Let it Bleed and give or take the odd song they`ve pretty much stayed with that.

I don`t see much progression between Jones leaving & Taylor joining , there wasn`t that much of a drastic change in sound between Jones last album Beggers Banquet & Let It Bleed which they both played on as opposed to Sticky Fingers & Exile which were all Taylor. In fact if anything they went back to their blues roots on exile.

I certainly don`t think it`s anywhere near the progession the Beatles made between Help through Rubber Soul , Revolver up to the White Album which was a phenominal change in direction, it almost sounds like a different band in some cases.
You forgot Goats Head Soup.

All I'm saying is the fact The Stones had more people in their band results in more variety of sounds and apporaches.
ShadowSurfer is offline