Quote:
Originally Posted by jwb
it's a fact that my decision has no bearing on the decisions of those millions of people
You want to assign the collective guilt of what happens based on the actions of millions of people to me but you can only actually assign 1/1,000,000th portion of that blame to me personally.
Similarly, the family gathering was happening regardless of if I attended personally or not so once again I would only theoretically be contributing a fraction of the risk generated by said gathering.
You can try your best to ignore these realities because it makes you feel good about yourself to moralize this **** but if anyone is deluded about the risks involved here it's you.
|
You're a ****ing pussy who can't admit to being morally lazy without simultaneously ducking responsibility. Sure, the probability of a spreader event was probably quite low but if it had happened and you had gotten sick or been the sick one who spread it then all your rationalizations would be meaningless and you would bear full responsibility for any consuquences for your actions.