Originally Posted by SoundgardenRocks

I like the question in principle and I think that would lead to an interesting though quite tangential discussion - but I think that particular question is too broad and nebulous for our purposes. To have any kind of meaningfull discourse with this question, it would beg further questions like:

"Our" - who is the identifying party implied? America? The west? The world? I suppose identifying this would reasonably define "populace"

"leaders" - what leaders? Political leaders? Spiritual leaders? Intellectual leaders?

"reflect or represent" - reflect or represent how? the interests of the populace? the ethnic makeup of the public?

"How well" - how do we quantify this?