Quote:
Originally Posted by MarieMarie
No it doesn't.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarieMarie
Your argument isn't clear enough to me to judge it. You're saying that you think consciousness is more than an accumulation of instincts and chemical processes in the brain because observation changes the outcome of a double-slit experiment? What are Penrose's arguments?
|
Then why did you judge it?
I’m just repeating what Ant said but if merely observing something alters the outcome it’s a reasonable assumption that there’s something to consciousness that extends beyond biology (or at least biology that resembles anything we understand to be biology).
I strongly lean in the other direction but that’s all the more reason to explore that argument.
Sorry if I stepped on your toes or misrepresented you Ant.