Quote:
Originally Posted by Anteater
Roger Penrose says you're wrong.
Simply put, if consciousness is just a series of mechanical processes and everything is just in our heads, observing a particle's path should have no bearing on any kind of result. And yet by observing a particle's path – even if that observation should not disturb the particle's motion – we change the outcome.
|
Your argument isn't clear enough to me to judge it. You're saying that you think consciousness is more than an accumulation of instincts and chemical processes in the brain because observation changes the outcome of a double-slit experiment? What are Penrose's arguments?