Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk
The original is so much better.
Always with this remastering ****. In general, with the original, the band was there, and that’s how the wanted it to sound.
If I have a choice I always go with the original. It’s gotta be the right call 99% of the time.
|
I'd agree with that. With the exception of much older albums, which couldn't at the time benefit from the technology we have now, this always seems a little superfluous. What? Was the original not good enough? You need to remaster it?
And yeah: nine out of ten times they lose something important in the mastering; almost like the life is clinically or surgically bled out of the music.