Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
Nah, I've not made a firm case for either direction, just stating one of the possibilities that the video fails to explore. You're the only one who's certain of its use despite glaring lack of evidence, which is what my original post was about. Be careful man, you're eating up propaganda with both hands, you're going to choke.
If CNN made a story on a similarly flimsy premise built on assumptions, you wouldn't believe a word of it. Come on man.
|
Nah, I feel its clear so I'm on board unless clearly proven otherwise for the time being, but if CNN covered something flimsy but I felt it was clear enough then I'd say fair enough until proven otherwise but I wouldn't know what they cover because I don't watch CNN, I barely get any of their channels here on Sky