Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
I was just trying to get your attention because I had mentioned it several times and you continually ignored it.
|
I don't see where. Nevertheless, rude.
Quote:
I imagine we'll be doing several different lists.
|
As long as it's we, and not just me.
Quote:
|
You can add it to the OP and mention that it's a work in progress. Problem solved. You're going to have a lot of people making redundant lists/items if what we have so far is in the middle of this thread and spread across several posts.
|
Done.
Quote:
|
Then try having a discussion. You joined a discussion forum, follow through.
|
I'm trying to; it's not easy when you two just say "we want it" and assume that's the end of the argument. It isn't. As I said, several times already, let's see what others have to say.
Quote:
You have yet to provide a good argument against it that wasn't a misunderstanding of the premise. Huh, weird how that goes.
|
My main argument against it is the amount of work it entails and also that yet again I have to remind you that of everyone who has posted here, only, so far as I can see, you and Batty are putting this idea forward. I had plenty of ideas, which were decent ones for categories, as I mentioned in the first few posts, but they were overruled for the decades thing, which I agreed with. So it's not like I'm being unreasonable. We should go with what the majority wants, not just two people, or one. Would you not agree with that?