Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
It really isn't that "suspicious", I think you might just be ignorant of journalistic practices. What are you suspicious of them having done?
And again, *clears throat*
WHY IS IT BAD?????
You being suspicious is not that bad ftr.
|
I'll spell it out.
BECAUSE MAKING CHANGES TO AN ARTICLE LIKE THAT MEANS THEY THINK TRUMP HAS CREDIBILITY WITH HIS ACCUSATIONS
...otherwise, as I've said, they wouldn't have bothered. But because they've done that, they've sown doubt where there didn't need to be. Especially since it was something they published over a MONTH ago.