Quote:
Originally Posted by djchameleon
No, he's not going to withdraw the comment and two he doesn't have to. The federal law prevents people in the executive branch from endorsing companies but presidents/president elects are exempt from this law. He can endorse all the companies he wants to all throughout his presidency.
Does it seem unethical? Damn skippy. Is it against the Law? No.
|
Never said it was. I said it was unethical. It's blurring the lines and it's a good example of (if you've seen the original House of Cards) "You might say that, I couldn't possibly comment!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor
What a fascist
Can't wait to hear how he got a hole in one on all courses the first time he golfed
|
Well he does own them all!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan
In a way you're right it's not the point because it wasn't a corporate donation. Linda Bean made a private donation, not a cooperate donation of the company's monkey. Mind you it was more than the allowable amount for that type of PAC, but amount would be allowable if it was a super PAC that can receive an unlimited amount. Scoffing at a $60,000 donation doesn't make sense when somehow other donation can be made in the millions of dollars.
OK the point was noted that Trump shouldn't had made a plug for LL Bean. And if you read Anteater's comment it was a no biggie, he's not in office. So why go after a company LL Bean which has no control over the matter?
Nice try LL Bean, Shannon Counter and her minions won't to see that, beacuase they are boycotting Facebook, dah.
For those upset that LL Bean might make money, please grab your wallet and mail it to George Soros. #grabyourwalletandmailittogeorgesoros
Billionaire George Soros Lost Nearly $1 Billion in Weeks After Trump Election - WSJ |
Bolded bit nearly made me piss myself. Rock on, Neapolitan!
