its biased because the person who wrote it was trying to tell the reader how great of a band the beatles were. im not saying that the one about the stones isnt biased...but the articles dont explore the bands weaker sides at all. trust me.....ask anyone on this forum.......they will tell you that both of those articles are biased. go ahead and print them out and take them to your english professor (assuming you are in school) and ask them if the article presents any sort of bias in the information provided. they are both trying to promote each band.
the people i have biases against are the people who call me out without presenting facts of their own.....especially when they are calling me a hypocrite after i have provided no propaganda or opinion on a subject at all.
why are you so hell bent on proof of everything?
__________________
How'd I end up here to begin with? I don't know.
Why do I start what I can't finish?
Oh please, don't barrage me with questions to all those ugly answers.
My ego's like my stomach- it keeps shitting what I feed it.
But maybe I don't want to finish anything anymore..
maybe I can wait in bed 'til she comes home. and whispers....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shooting Star
Remember kids: It's only real metal if the vocalist sounds like he's vomiting up a fetus. \m/
|
|