Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jibber
It's funny how when a band stops making music has such a huge impact on how good of a band they're considered to be. So how much of a factor is it really? When it comes down to it, does it matter that the Stones made a few mediocre albums when they (arguably) had just as many successful ones as the Beatles?
|
I guess for me it's that growing up the first reference point I ever had of the Stones was Jagger making an almighty tit of himself on 'Dancing in the Street'. That isn't something you can easily forget when you're young. It influences you. It took me years to summon up the courage to listen to a Bowie album because of that song.